Suchergebnisse

The article is dedicated to investigation of theoretical and legal characteristics of the effectiveness of law as a legal category. First of all, it is established that realization of the positive potential of law as a social regulator depends on the effectiveness of law chiefly, which is characterized by the state of order of social relations due to the legal support. An essence of the effectiveness of law as a correlation of certain components, a certain characteristic of the law, a multifaceted legal category and an interdisciplinary category is also revealed. Following this it is characterized a socio-legal nature of the effectiveness of law, which is conditioned by the necessity of ensuring the diverse interests of society by legal remedies. Then, on the basis of analysis of the scientific concepts it is formulated an author's definition of the concept of the effectiveness of law as a complex quantitative and qualitative characteristic of action of the objective law, which denotes measure and character of the effective impact of law on state of order of social relations, expressing realized potential of law. Afterwards, an expression of the potential of the effectiveness of law as positive or negative, a quantitative and qualitative characteristic, its existence in objective reality and interconnection with it, orientation on ensuring of the positive development of society are attributed to the features of the effectiveness of law. Furthermore, it is found out the great meaning of the effectiveness of law as a component of the system of legal values for the development of person, society, state and even the same law, because exactly this legal category allows the law to be realized in objective reality. Eventually, it is analyzed and improved the theoretical and legal statements concerning correlation of the effectiveness of law with related concepts, namely with the effectiveness of legal norms, the effectiveness of legislation and the effectiveness of legal regulation, which can be explain as follows: the ...

The article is dedicated to investigation of problems and perspectives of application of the insignificance of action as a category of criminal law. It is found out that the insignificance of action is a legislative way of demarcation of crimes from other actions, which is a certain guarantee of providing of fairness of the criminal law and economy of criminally-legal repression. A legislative construction about the insignificance of action is an evaluation concept, which is also a way of enforceable decriminalization. The essence of the insignificance of action includes it's evaluation character and property to provide fairness and individualization of imposition of criminal penalty. The features of this criminally-legal category are absence of public danger, connection with discretionary authorities and possibility of engaging for other kind of legal liability. An absence of public danger in action is a main criterion for recognition an action as insignificant and it is expressed in absence of significant damage. It is also determined that main aspects of application of the insignificance of action are established with court practice and science of criminal law. They concern to formal presence in a committed act of signs of a composition of a crime, absence of typical for a certain crime public danger and absence of subjective tendency on causing of significant damage. A necessity of saving and further using of the rule of law about the insignificance of action is pointed. Problematic aspects of criminal rule of law about the insignificance of action, which include a collision, a fiction and a contradiction to unity of terminology, are revealed and analyzed. It is suggested to formulate the rule of law about the insignificance of action in such version: "The action or inaction is not a crime if it is not publically dangerous and because of the insignificance it does not amount a public danger for protected with law about criminal liability objects, namely it did not cause and could not cause enough for ...